Open Source AI Definition – Weekly update June 24
Explaining the concept of Data information
Following @stefano’s publication regarding why the OSI considers training data to be “optional” under the checklist in Open Source AI Definition, the debate has continued. Here are the main points:
- Preferred Form of Modification
- @hartmans states finding an agreement on the meaning of “preferred form of modification” depends on the user’s objectives. The disagreement may stem from different priorities in ranking the freedoms associated with open source AI, though they emphasize prioritizing model weights for practical modifications. He suggested that data information could be more beneficial than raw data for understanding models and urged flexibility in AI definitions.
- @shujisado highlighted that training data for machine learning models is a preferred form of modification but questioned if it is the most preferred. He further emphasized the need for a flexible definition for preferred forms of modification in AI.
- @quaid supported the idea of conducting controlled experiments to determine if data information alone is sufficient to recreate AI models accurately. Suggested practical steps for testing the effectiveness of data information and encouraged community participation in such experiments.
- @jberkus raised concerns about the practical assessment of data information and its ability to facilitate the recreation of AI systems. He questioned how to evaluate data information without recreating the AI system.
- Practical Applications and Community Insights
- @hartmans proposed practical scenarios where data information could suffice for modifying AI models and suggested that the community’s flexibility in defining the preferred form of modification has been valuable for Debian.
- @quaid shared insights from his research on the OpenVLA project, noting its compliance with OSAID requirements. He further proposed conducting controlled experiments to verify if data information is enough to recreate models with fidelity.
- General observations
- @shujisado emphasized the need for flexible definitions in AI, drawing from open-source community experiences. Agreed on the complexity of training data issues and supported the flexible approach of OSI in defining the preferred form of modification.
- @quaid suggested practical approaches for evaluating data information and its adequacy for recreating AI models and proposed further experiments and community involvement to refine the understanding and application of data information in open-source AI.
Are we evaluating Licenses or Systems?
- @jberkus asked whether OSAID will apply to licenses or systems, noting that current drafts focus on systems. He questioned if a certification program for reviewing systems as open source or proprietary is the intended direction.
- @shujisado confirmed that discussions are moving towards certifying AI systems and pointed at an existing thread. He emphasized the need for evaluating individual components of AI systems and expressed concern about OSI’s capacity to establish a certification mechanism, highlighting that it would significantly expand OSI’s role.
previous - next
Tags: ai, Deep Dive: AI, News
Leave a Reply