Meta’s LLaMa license is still not Open Source

A year ago we called on Meta to stop calling Llama 2  “Open Source.” Since then, Meta has released new versions of Llama with new licensing terms that continue to fail the Open Source Definition. Llama 3.x is still not Open Source by any stretch of the imagination. Despite that, Meta keeps on falsely promoting Llama as “Open Source.” You can help us stop that now: call on Zuckerberg and Yann LeCunn to change the Llama license and comply with the Open Source Definition.

There is no need to bring up the new Open Source AI Definition v.1.0 to evaluate if the Llama 3 model series and its Llama 3.x community licences convey basic freedoms to their users. We agree with the Free Software Foundation’s recent evaluation that the Llama 3.1 Community Licence agreement fails in spectacular ways at granting basic rights:

These restrictions were already clear in the license used by Llama 2. The newer versions of Meta’s Llama community licence impose even more restrictions, like excluding any persons in the European Union from using the model without explanation; and all of the restrictions from the previous licences remain. 

We are disheartened to see a couple of individuals entangling their criticisms of the Open Source AI Definition with Meta’s abuse of the term Open Source referring to Llama. The OSAID did not create any confusion about the proprietary nature of Llama; in fact, Meta’s open washing, and our response to it, predate the OSAID entirely.

These individuals are supporting Meta’s open washing efforts, and sowing fear, uncertainties and doubts within the community.

What you can do about it

At a time when Meta is trying to redefine Open Source for their own benefit and at the expense of our freedom, we call on the whole Open Source community to unite and call out Meta’s open washing.

OSI will continue to fight back against open washing with public statements, events, and educational work with the Open Source and AI communities, lawmakers, and businesses.

Click Here to View Original Source (opensource.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shared by: voicesofopensource

Tags: , , ,